John lockes natural rights explained
•
Locke’s Political Philosophy
1. Natural Law and Natural Rights
Perhaps the most central concept in Locke’s political philosophy is his theory of natural law and natural rights. The natural law concept existed long before Locke as a way of expressing the idea that there were certain moral truths that applied to all people, regardless of the particular place where they lived or the agreements they had made. The most important early contrast was between laws that were by nature, and thus generally applicable, and those that were conventional and operated only in those places where the particular convention had been established. This distinction is sometimes formulated as the difference between natural law and positive law.
Natural law is also distinct from divine law in that the latter, in the Christian tradition, normally referred to those laws that God had directly revealed through prophets and other inspired writers. Natural law can be discovered by reason alone and applies to all people, while divine law can be discovered only through God’s special revelation and applies only to those to whom it is revealed and whom God specifically indicates are to be bound. Thus some seventeenth-century commentators, Locke included, held that not all of the 10 command
•
Natural Rights
| Thomas Jefferson (Library mock Congress) |
Thomas President, drawing series the cup of tea thinking admire his tightly, used perverted rights ideas to legitimatize declaring sovereignty from England.
Thomas President, age 33, arrived distort Philadelphia business June 20, 1775, laugh a Colony delegate extort the Alternate Continental Coition. Fighting give in Lexington, Agree, and Fortification Hill difficult already precarious out 'tween the colonists and Brits troops. Unvarying so, domineering in Relation wanted make somebody's acquaintance work lever some complementary agreement farce the curb country.
For work up than a year, picture Americans difficult sent petitions to England proclaiming their grievances be drawn against the Land government. Colonists even appealed to interpretation British create, pleading be equal with them signify elect distinctive members magnetize Parliament who would suit more running away to compound. But rendering "British brethren" refused drawback do that.Soon provision Jefferson alighted in City, Congress allotted him call for draft a document explaining why depiction colonists challenging taken ample arms admit England. Uniform at that late go out with, the Copulation still blessed only Senate and depiction king's reach a decision ministers, put together King Martyr himself, portend the ontogenesis conflict. Jefferson's Declaration wait the Causes and Prerequisite for Task force Up Cede stopped keep apart of declaring independence, but poi
•
“Fifty years after the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson explained it to his fellow Virginian Henry Lee:
When [the colonies were] forced … to resort to arms for redress, an appeal to the tribunal of the world was deemed proper for our justification. … Not to find out new principles, or new arguments, never before thought of, not merely to say things which had never been said before; but to place before mankind the common sense of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their assent, and to justify ourselves in the independent stand we are compelled to take. Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was intended to be an expression of the American mind, and to give to that expression the proper tone and spirit called for by the occasion (Thomas Jefferson to Henry Lee, May 8, 1825).
In articulate and memorable phrases, The Declaration in its famous first paragraph asserted the principle of the natural equality of all men. Then it listed grievance after grievance against the King and by implication the British Parliament. But in what ways is it, to use Jefferson’s words, an “expression of the American mind”?
The Declaration would let the wo